Home Page

 

1. What is the complete name of this book?

 

Why do you think this name was chosen?

 

2. What can you learn about the author of Acts?

 

What one characteristic distinguishes him from other New Testament writers?

 

3. About a century ago British scholar William Ramsay focused on the book of Acts to try to show it was rife with geographical and archaeological errors. After all, many scholars of his day, equipped with the tools of textual criticism and archaeology, had exposed many errors in other classic writings. This eminent humanity professor diligently prepared himself by studying archaeology and geography before departing for the Middle East and Asia Minor in his quest to prove Luke's history of the early Church was mostly myth.

His quest didn't turn out as he expected. After a quarter century of research in what is today Israel and Turkey, where he carefully retraced the steps of the apostles as described in the book of Acts, this famous unbeliever shook the intellectual world when he announced he had converted to Christianity. He confessed this radical change of mind and heart was thanks in great part to his surprise at the accuracy he found in Luke's narrative in Acts.

After decades of examining the historical and geographical details mentioned in the book, Ramsay concluded: "Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy, he is possessed of the true historic sense ... In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians" (The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament, 1953, p. 80).

He went on to write many books about Acts and the epistles of Paul. Ultimately Ramsay was knighted for his contributions to the study of archaeology and geography.

What can we learn about Acts from this account?

If the study of Acts leads an unbeliever to Jesus, what should the study of Acts do for the believer?

 

4. Read v. 1. What was the first or former book?

How does Acts pick up where the other book left off?

 

Luke says he wrote about two main points. What are they?

 

What do these two points tell us about our ministry?

 

5. What can we learn about the importance of the Holy Spirit from v. 2?

 

What does it mean to you that Jesus gave the instructions through the Holy Spirit?

 

6. What is the definition of the word "proof"?

 

However, we find the phrase "convincing proofs" or "infallible proofs" in verse 3. What do these phrases signify to you?

 

7. Why did Jesus command them to wait in Jerusalem?

 

Do you think the people understood what He meant? Why or why not?

 

8. In verse 5 Jesus says that they will be baptized with the Holy Spirit. Other versions read they will be immersed in the Holy Spirit. What does it mean to be baptized or immersed in the Holy Spirit?

 

Was this promise just for the disciples or does it apply to us as well?

 

9. Verse 3 tells us that Jesus spoke about the kingdom of God. What question do the disciples ask Jesus in verse 6 that shows they might not fully have understood His teaching at the time?

 

How does Jesus’ answer to them in verse 7 apply to us today?

 

10. Verse 8 states the theme of Acts. What four "stages" are listed in verse 8?

 

Is verse 8 another command? Explain.

 

However, what had to happen before they could do this?

 

How could we apply this verse to our lives today?

 

11. This may seem like a silly question, but what do you think the disciples were thinking as they watched Jesus ascend to heaven?

 

What do you think they were feeling?

 

What message do the angels give them and us?

 

12. What defined a Sabbath Day’s walk? Why do you think Luke mentioned this fact?

 

13. What do we see happening in verse 13 that shows the disciples are changing? (See John 20:19.)

 

14. What were ALL the people doing as they waited in that upper room? (Read several versions of verse 14.)

 

                Who do you think the women were? Why were they not mentioned by name?

 

15. Read vv. 15-26. Who seems to be the leader? In light of his behavior at Jesus’ crucifixion, how would have felt about his leadership?

 

What place do scriptures play in this meeting? To what scriptures are they referring?

 

What can we learn about "prayer meetings" from this passage?

 

What should be the main focus?

 

Are "prayer meetings" still important? Why or why not?

 

If yes, do you attend? Why or why not? (This question is not designed to bring condemnation but honest reflection.)

 

16. According to Peter, what qualifications does Judas’ replacement have to meet?

 

Why?

 

What was the disciples’ main purpose? (See v. 22.)

 

17. Are we called to be witnesses of Jesus’ resurrection?

 

How can we witness to this event?

 

Why would this be important?

 

What do you know about Matthias?

 

18. What was involved in their decision-making process?

 

What does this tell us about how we should choose church leaders today?

 

Does the church follow these guidelines? Why or why not?

 

19. How can you apply Acts 1 to your life?

 

What promises and challenges does it hold?